O1
Writing Provenance Layer
Bind AI-generated text to archival sources, extraction nodes, and model operations.
O1
Bind AI-generated text to archival sources, extraction nodes, and model operations.
O2
Evaluate when fine-tuning preserves rather than flattens authorial and cultural voice.
O3
Deployable open-source prototype and responsible-design methodology for practitioners.
Research programme
How can an AI system preserve the genealogy of knowledge — not merely cite a source, but expose the chain of transformations through which generated text became what it is?
GraphRAG, layout-aware document parsing, and Postgres-native graph modelling are enabling technologies within this programme, not the destination.
Computational Provenance
The Writing Provenance Layer (O1) formalised as a W3C PROV-O extension aligned to CIDOC-CRM — grounding the methodology in a standard two decades older than LLMs.
Document Intelligence
A falsifiable novelty test: does any published system anchor knowledge construction in precise page/bounding-box coordinates, as the applicant's own extraction pipeline already does? A rigorous negative result is itself the finding.
Synthetic Mediation / Algorithmic Heritage
Archives and platforms that generate afterlives without lying about how they know — memory situated as problem diagnosis, not field home.
Voice Fidelity
Restoration, interpretation, simulation, forgery — a rubric for when generated text preserves rather than flattens authorial and cultural voice.
Computational Authorship
Provenance for AI co-production — editor, conservator, or co-author?
Knowledge Engines
A research instrument, not a chatbot.
Cultural Infrastructure
Built for Europeana, DARIAH, IIIF, CIDOC CRM — the customer is the institution, not the model vendor.
The 24-month fellowship builds the instrument; the research programme continues beyond it toward an ERC-scale proposal.
Supervisor onboarding, pitch deck, and phased workbook for the full proposal.